Boulder Real Estate
Boulder Colorado Real Estate Agent.
Boulder Real Estate Market Tips, Boulder Real Estate Market Analysis.
Boulder Colorado Real Estate Broker.
Boulder Colorado News
FTC Docket 9288, May 1998.. So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?
Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998.. So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?
Over a Decade. WHAT !!
Prior Reports IGNORED by those Paid to Protect YOU???
"" Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998, various reports and analysis are submitted by this analyst to FTC now operating in voluntary civic service capacity under Department of Labor Code 3363.5. Today a decade of analysis delivers tens of Docket 9341 discovery proofs or pointers to proofs.
Many of which this audience are familiar from prior reports by this analyst submitted to U.S. Senate, Congress, State AGs and U.S. Attorneys.
Under Docket 9341 discovery rules, work from this analyst is passed by FTC Bureau of Competition to Intel for legal rebuttal.
Three Components of Monopoly Recovery
Monopoly recovery is a worldwide financial value having three main components:
1) Consumer recovery is based on the system costs of Intel Inside tied charge back for routing Intel microprocessors across state lines and inter nation boundaries inside a computer chassis. See prior analyst submissions for specific details covering the illegal aspects of this market rigging rebate fee scheme.
SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys
2) Consumer recovery from monopoly price premium associated with some Intel microprocessor and PC product introductions.
3) Industrial harms which include predatory product dumping, Intel selling at a price less then average total cost, measures of variable down to average fixed cost. Finally, estimation of the marginal cost for Intel to produce a single x86 microprocessor in relation to price sought with variable cost cross check. Where price is within or lower then average fixed cost, variable or marginal cost, revenues
from those quantities are recorded as an industrial monopolization recovery value for FTC discovery.
Consumer Recovery Subset 1; kick back, in violation of Sherman Act Section 1, Section 2, Clayton Act Section 2, 3, 4, 5, 13e, 13c, 13d, Title 48, 1986 anti kickback act
Of the $26.442 billion subset of consumer recovery documented from Intel production estimates (where $42 billion total set is documented by contract), $22.657 billion or 85% is associated with Intel Inside tied charge back sum misrepresented in Intel and PC Dealer financials. That sum is split between Intel and PC Companies 50:50 for the purpose of this analysis based on the Intel Inside monopoly system metric. Yet Intel’s portion is known to increase, and PC Companies decrease, over the 15 year duration of this Intel Insider operation.
Intel financials associate Intel Inside as a marketing cost credited to PC Company micro- processor sales. When this commissionable sales value is actually an accrued Dealer rebate passed through Intel as a sales reward for Media Sales Agents taken as their fee, to sustain the supply chain’s product distribution ties between Intel, PC Dealers and Media Agent’s sales channels. Sales Channels include PC Week, PC Magazine, Computer Shopper, Family Computing, PC World, Windows Magazine, other PC and some general media.
Rebate values are sustained from back in time with forward time purchase agreements. Production short run to short run, Dealer’s microprocessor purchases are unnaturally weighted to benefit them guiding Media Agents sales preferences. Intel 1st tier Dealers purchase microprocessors in excess of end demand solely to strip margin values, including consumer transport charge, prior to reselling overage into secondary broker channels. PC Dealers who are Intel’s 1st tier brokers monopolize majority of Intel margin values, including tied charge back, sustaining their Media Sales Agent artificial attractor and the cross industry distribution tie in total.
This relationship is a financially driven one, planned and implemented for Media Sales Agents to register, meter, report level’s of Intel microprocessor flows through PC dealer channels back to Intel. That is the nature of the charge back; for media registering and reporting back channel sales flows through PC Companies to Intel. Over time the system evolved into one which accelerated Dealer product flows artificially from one Intel product generation to the next, on the weight of Intel kickback placements meant to discharge certain Dealer inventory, to end market buyers, on an Intel time schedule.
SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys ""
Source of Post
Document the FTC, DOJ, SEC, State Attorney Generals, FBI and more know of and seem to be ignoring.. Go to www.CEOpaulOtellini.com document at top of blog...
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Over a Decade. WHAT !!
Prior Reports IGNORED by those Paid to Protect YOU???
"" Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998, various reports and analysis are submitted by this analyst to FTC now operating in voluntary civic service capacity under Department of Labor Code 3363.5. Today a decade of analysis delivers tens of Docket 9341 discovery proofs or pointers to proofs.
Many of which this audience are familiar from prior reports by this analyst submitted to U.S. Senate, Congress, State AGs and U.S. Attorneys.
Under Docket 9341 discovery rules, work from this analyst is passed by FTC Bureau of Competition to Intel for legal rebuttal.
Three Components of Monopoly Recovery
Monopoly recovery is a worldwide financial value having three main components:
1) Consumer recovery is based on the system costs of Intel Inside tied charge back for routing Intel microprocessors across state lines and inter nation boundaries inside a computer chassis. See prior analyst submissions for specific details covering the illegal aspects of this market rigging rebate fee scheme.
SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys
2) Consumer recovery from monopoly price premium associated with some Intel microprocessor and PC product introductions.
3) Industrial harms which include predatory product dumping, Intel selling at a price less then average total cost, measures of variable down to average fixed cost. Finally, estimation of the marginal cost for Intel to produce a single x86 microprocessor in relation to price sought with variable cost cross check. Where price is within or lower then average fixed cost, variable or marginal cost, revenues
from those quantities are recorded as an industrial monopolization recovery value for FTC discovery.
Consumer Recovery Subset 1; kick back, in violation of Sherman Act Section 1, Section 2, Clayton Act Section 2, 3, 4, 5, 13e, 13c, 13d, Title 48, 1986 anti kickback act
Of the $26.442 billion subset of consumer recovery documented from Intel production estimates (where $42 billion total set is documented by contract), $22.657 billion or 85% is associated with Intel Inside tied charge back sum misrepresented in Intel and PC Dealer financials. That sum is split between Intel and PC Companies 50:50 for the purpose of this analysis based on the Intel Inside monopoly system metric. Yet Intel’s portion is known to increase, and PC Companies decrease, over the 15 year duration of this Intel Insider operation.
Intel financials associate Intel Inside as a marketing cost credited to PC Company micro- processor sales. When this commissionable sales value is actually an accrued Dealer rebate passed through Intel as a sales reward for Media Sales Agents taken as their fee, to sustain the supply chain’s product distribution ties between Intel, PC Dealers and Media Agent’s sales channels. Sales Channels include PC Week, PC Magazine, Computer Shopper, Family Computing, PC World, Windows Magazine, other PC and some general media.
Rebate values are sustained from back in time with forward time purchase agreements. Production short run to short run, Dealer’s microprocessor purchases are unnaturally weighted to benefit them guiding Media Agents sales preferences. Intel 1st tier Dealers purchase microprocessors in excess of end demand solely to strip margin values, including consumer transport charge, prior to reselling overage into secondary broker channels. PC Dealers who are Intel’s 1st tier brokers monopolize majority of Intel margin values, including tied charge back, sustaining their Media Sales Agent artificial attractor and the cross industry distribution tie in total.
This relationship is a financially driven one, planned and implemented for Media Sales Agents to register, meter, report level’s of Intel microprocessor flows through PC dealer channels back to Intel. That is the nature of the charge back; for media registering and reporting back channel sales flows through PC Companies to Intel. Over time the system evolved into one which accelerated Dealer product flows artificially from one Intel product generation to the next, on the weight of Intel kickback placements meant to discharge certain Dealer inventory, to end market buyers, on an Intel time schedule.
SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys ""
Source of Post
Document the FTC, DOJ, SEC, State Attorney Generals, FBI and more know of and seem to be ignoring.. Go to www.CEOpaulOtellini.com document at top of blog...
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
FTC in Intel Settlement Talks; before July 22? Intel Closed Door Settlements with the FTC? Intel Executive Amnesty???
"FTC in Intel Settlement Talks; before July 22?
Please be advised this analyst is opposed to Intel closed door settlement with FTC on or before July 22; transparency being at issue.
Commissioners and discovery team know RICO, Sherman Act Section 1 and Section 2 per se violations are documented.
This analyst encourages the September hearing proceed accordingly for full disclosure, full remedies, consumer recovery which is a core value of the FTC’s charter.
Advantageously and for hearing efficiency, all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims lacking specific per se condemnation precedent, can be reviewed between the Section 1 and RICO Proofs, without fear of FTC 9341 overall case loss.
Including waste of Federal financial and manpower resource, further, that FCA has already been won on weight of evidence and is itself capable of recovering a portion, if not all, FTC 9341 litigation costs.
This analyst believes it important that every American know how to spot competition espionage occurring in the work place in real time, how to report in real time, how to resolve in real time and not over 18 year’s time as in my case.
In this continuing case of Intel Monopoly analysis, meant for FTC and DOJ discovery, leadership, error correction, law augments, inter Nation competition policy evolution, Intel Network, system and structural improvement, RICO and competition remedies and consumer recoveries.
In addition financial recovery of the economic damages for all targets harmed and pushed under by Intel Network, including in the Docket 9288 case obstruction are required under Intel’s DOJ antitrust compliance obligations.
That is for Intel and Network Executive Amnesty and or immunity from maximum antitrust and RICO damages. This would seem to include those associated with FTC Docket 9341.
I’d presume Intel is Participating in reversing the frame and fraud associated with Docket 9288 obstruction.
Alternatively in the face of a known obstruction in the administration of justice which includes witness tampering, fraudulent construction and white wash, the Docket 9341 clock could be reset to June 11, 1991.
June 11, 1991 is the inception of the Intel Insider Scheme enabling a complete Intel monopoly consumer recovery.
Pursuant to Docket 9341, I am concerned that $72 billion dollars in monopolization have been calculated.
And that the worldwide consumer recoverable from Intel tied charge back, and monopoly price of up to $42 billion, will be left un-recovered or left on the negotiating table in any FTC closed door Docket 9341 settlement.
Our knowing this fact of the consumer recoverable, legitimately, consumers are due their return from Intel and Network members.
The history of Intel class actions suggests any privately litigated consumer class action will be blown or settled on disproportionate values too harms.
This attorney opinion is supported by historical evaluation, including attorneys who would take the FCA, if not for their knowledge of the history of Intel market rigging, the various corporate political, time trap and litigation hurdles.
Intel Network adverse litigation for year’s has been sand bagged, blown, thrown and settled on minor causes with slim remedies and minor financial recovery in relation to harms. Here our countries history of private antitrust litigation ends until attorneys who would risk toughest corporate, political, legal and judicial hurdles resolves itself.
FTC and DOJ can restart that tradition of private antitrust litigation with full Intel Network disclosures, monopoly encompassing remedies and recoveries, where world wide consumer recoveries are due consumers including the Federal government.
Bursting boilers and the Federal Power, Garrison Dam Disaster and the Federal Power, Bar Pilots and the Federal Power, Finance & Securities Disaster and Federal Power, broken oil well valves and the Federal Power, broken regulatory & the Federal Power; fixing broken Intel and the Federal Power, transparently, offers the potential for one of Intel’s greatest legacies.
A cornerstone on which willing members of Bar and Bench, and corporate entities, will see and take action regulation seriously. Lacking Bar and Bench free from corporate political network control, I fear broken regulatory will remain.
A functional regulatory, Bar & Bench, are required first lines of monopoly and rackets error detection and correction.
Pursuant to FCA, I will be requesting Congress and/or President Obama please assign a Federal attorney for qui tam representation.
A case to whom I am recognized Relator and hold the U.S. Attorney recovery reward letter, having been steward for many years before and following my official Relator status.
No legitimate private attorney will take the case in the face of the market rig.
Fifth, finance and investment bankers use Quanda model, with price projection tools, to model Intel revenue and margins; like media retrospectively, to play the stock up to two years in advance.
Sixth, Intel inside individual stock traders can do the same thing as I’ve demonstrated to FTC and U.S. DOJ.
Seventh, the Intel Quanda on mass weight of use, retrospectively, extended Intel’s x86 and PC market rigs to the NASDAQ; including in relation to other exchanges.
Think about it, Intel Insider ability to play the stock of Intel and PC Dealers up to two years in advance is an extreme catalyst to rig not only individual stock prices, but the NASDAQ index itself.
The Quanda was used to rig markets;
Intel had DOJ 1st report responsibility.
Eight, combination and cartel proofs exist throughout Intel economic and system structural proofs. Structural proofs are easily deciphered from their component patterns and prove intent to monopolize per se. No other conduct proofs are required.
Nine, U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission are well aware of the Section 1 per se condemnations, Section 2 per se intent, RICO, Quanda and its reliance by Intel Network as one of their many market rigging tools.
Ten, for FTC there is no risk of Docket 9341 case loss where all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims concerning access to Intel component taper, Intel benchmark rigging, false statements to Federal procurement by Intel, Dealers and Agents concealing fraudulent and monopoly costs assessed on the Federal Government computer payment claims.
All can be heard within the bracket; Section 1 structure, Section 2 intent and RICO proofs. Please consider one of multiple proofs below:
In the RICO proof below, find partial classic Intel Xeon Tanner and Xeon Copper mine economic analysis. Playing signaling revealed by the Quanda, savvy PC Dealers were informed to stick with the quasi static equilibrium and back eddy offered by Xeon Tanner, and to avoid being washed over the falls that is Xeon Cascades.
Cascades is the Intel desktop microprocessor Copper mine 256, repackaged as a high performance Xeon server product at monopoly price premium and for dumping onto AMD. Xeon Cascades was not a high performance product and by June 2000 main board suppliers serving the broker system market, had rejected it, causing Intel to cancel its retail boxed version of the Cascade product line. Cascade’s was then left to sell through Intel primary Dealer channels.
Please note that AMD Opteron code names; Sledge Hammer and Claw Hammer, follow in response to Intel Network notice of Tanner signaling and pending Cascade predatory product dumping. Dumping is relied on by Intel a lot.
Strategically to stop current competitive product flows in channels or to make it unprofitable for competitors to enter that product category.
Full Document and Source:
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
on Top of Site...
Information by
Mike Bruzzone
Intel Case Technical Analysis since 1996
Camp Marketing Consultancy
posted Here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Got an Intel Insider Trading TIP?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Please be advised this analyst is opposed to Intel closed door settlement with FTC on or before July 22; transparency being at issue.
Commissioners and discovery team know RICO, Sherman Act Section 1 and Section 2 per se violations are documented.
This analyst encourages the September hearing proceed accordingly for full disclosure, full remedies, consumer recovery which is a core value of the FTC’s charter.
Advantageously and for hearing efficiency, all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims lacking specific per se condemnation precedent, can be reviewed between the Section 1 and RICO Proofs, without fear of FTC 9341 overall case loss.
Including waste of Federal financial and manpower resource, further, that FCA has already been won on weight of evidence and is itself capable of recovering a portion, if not all, FTC 9341 litigation costs.
This analyst believes it important that every American know how to spot competition espionage occurring in the work place in real time, how to report in real time, how to resolve in real time and not over 18 year’s time as in my case.
In this continuing case of Intel Monopoly analysis, meant for FTC and DOJ discovery, leadership, error correction, law augments, inter Nation competition policy evolution, Intel Network, system and structural improvement, RICO and competition remedies and consumer recoveries.
In addition financial recovery of the economic damages for all targets harmed and pushed under by Intel Network, including in the Docket 9288 case obstruction are required under Intel’s DOJ antitrust compliance obligations.
That is for Intel and Network Executive Amnesty and or immunity from maximum antitrust and RICO damages. This would seem to include those associated with FTC Docket 9341.
I’d presume Intel is Participating in reversing the frame and fraud associated with Docket 9288 obstruction.
Alternatively in the face of a known obstruction in the administration of justice which includes witness tampering, fraudulent construction and white wash, the Docket 9341 clock could be reset to June 11, 1991.
June 11, 1991 is the inception of the Intel Insider Scheme enabling a complete Intel monopoly consumer recovery.
Pursuant to Docket 9341, I am concerned that $72 billion dollars in monopolization have been calculated.
And that the worldwide consumer recoverable from Intel tied charge back, and monopoly price of up to $42 billion, will be left un-recovered or left on the negotiating table in any FTC closed door Docket 9341 settlement.
Our knowing this fact of the consumer recoverable, legitimately, consumers are due their return from Intel and Network members.
The history of Intel class actions suggests any privately litigated consumer class action will be blown or settled on disproportionate values too harms.
This attorney opinion is supported by historical evaluation, including attorneys who would take the FCA, if not for their knowledge of the history of Intel market rigging, the various corporate political, time trap and litigation hurdles.
Intel Network adverse litigation for year’s has been sand bagged, blown, thrown and settled on minor causes with slim remedies and minor financial recovery in relation to harms. Here our countries history of private antitrust litigation ends until attorneys who would risk toughest corporate, political, legal and judicial hurdles resolves itself.
FTC and DOJ can restart that tradition of private antitrust litigation with full Intel Network disclosures, monopoly encompassing remedies and recoveries, where world wide consumer recoveries are due consumers including the Federal government.
Bursting boilers and the Federal Power, Garrison Dam Disaster and the Federal Power, Bar Pilots and the Federal Power, Finance & Securities Disaster and Federal Power, broken oil well valves and the Federal Power, broken regulatory & the Federal Power; fixing broken Intel and the Federal Power, transparently, offers the potential for one of Intel’s greatest legacies.
A cornerstone on which willing members of Bar and Bench, and corporate entities, will see and take action regulation seriously. Lacking Bar and Bench free from corporate political network control, I fear broken regulatory will remain.
A functional regulatory, Bar & Bench, are required first lines of monopoly and rackets error detection and correction.
Pursuant to FCA, I will be requesting Congress and/or President Obama please assign a Federal attorney for qui tam representation.
A case to whom I am recognized Relator and hold the U.S. Attorney recovery reward letter, having been steward for many years before and following my official Relator status.
No legitimate private attorney will take the case in the face of the market rig.
Fifth, finance and investment bankers use Quanda model, with price projection tools, to model Intel revenue and margins; like media retrospectively, to play the stock up to two years in advance.
Sixth, Intel inside individual stock traders can do the same thing as I’ve demonstrated to FTC and U.S. DOJ.
Seventh, the Intel Quanda on mass weight of use, retrospectively, extended Intel’s x86 and PC market rigs to the NASDAQ; including in relation to other exchanges.
Think about it, Intel Insider ability to play the stock of Intel and PC Dealers up to two years in advance is an extreme catalyst to rig not only individual stock prices, but the NASDAQ index itself.
The Quanda was used to rig markets;
Intel had DOJ 1st report responsibility.
Eight, combination and cartel proofs exist throughout Intel economic and system structural proofs. Structural proofs are easily deciphered from their component patterns and prove intent to monopolize per se. No other conduct proofs are required.
Nine, U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission are well aware of the Section 1 per se condemnations, Section 2 per se intent, RICO, Quanda and its reliance by Intel Network as one of their many market rigging tools.
Ten, for FTC there is no risk of Docket 9341 case loss where all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims concerning access to Intel component taper, Intel benchmark rigging, false statements to Federal procurement by Intel, Dealers and Agents concealing fraudulent and monopoly costs assessed on the Federal Government computer payment claims.
All can be heard within the bracket; Section 1 structure, Section 2 intent and RICO proofs. Please consider one of multiple proofs below:
In the RICO proof below, find partial classic Intel Xeon Tanner and Xeon Copper mine economic analysis. Playing signaling revealed by the Quanda, savvy PC Dealers were informed to stick with the quasi static equilibrium and back eddy offered by Xeon Tanner, and to avoid being washed over the falls that is Xeon Cascades.
Cascades is the Intel desktop microprocessor Copper mine 256, repackaged as a high performance Xeon server product at monopoly price premium and for dumping onto AMD. Xeon Cascades was not a high performance product and by June 2000 main board suppliers serving the broker system market, had rejected it, causing Intel to cancel its retail boxed version of the Cascade product line. Cascade’s was then left to sell through Intel primary Dealer channels.
Please note that AMD Opteron code names; Sledge Hammer and Claw Hammer, follow in response to Intel Network notice of Tanner signaling and pending Cascade predatory product dumping. Dumping is relied on by Intel a lot.
Strategically to stop current competitive product flows in channels or to make it unprofitable for competitors to enter that product category.
Full Document and Source:
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
on Top of Site...
Information by
Mike Bruzzone
Intel Case Technical Analysis since 1996
Camp Marketing Consultancy
posted Here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Got an Intel Insider Trading TIP?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
V3RGE now selling surplus gaming hardware direct to public.V3RGE
V3RGE is The premier wholesaler of refurbished consumer gaming hardware
V3RGE will sell products through the Internet.
V3RGE will also sell V3RGE Products from their V3RGE retail seasonal outlet stores in East Peoria, IL, August 19, 2010:
V3RGE, the premier wholesaler and refurbisher of consumer gaming hardware will offer their products directly to the public via the internet and regional seasonal outlet stores.
Systems offered by V3RGE will include Microsoft Xbox 360, Sony Playstation 3 and PSP, and Nintendo Wii and DS.
V3RGE will also offer gaming accessories such as OEM controllers and hard drives.
V3RGE has begun listing the products on Amazon.com with plans to expand their V3RGE eCommerce site as well.
The V3RGE retail stores will be located in Central Illinois, to be serviced by V3RGE 's East Peoria distribution center, and will also include games and software titles for the V3RGE systems.
V3RGE will sell products through the Internet.
V3RGE will also sell V3RGE Products from their V3RGE retail seasonal outlet stores in East Peoria, IL, August 19, 2010:
V3RGE, the premier wholesaler and refurbisher of consumer gaming hardware will offer their products directly to the public via the internet and regional seasonal outlet stores.
Systems offered by V3RGE will include Microsoft Xbox 360, Sony Playstation 3 and PSP, and Nintendo Wii and DS.
V3RGE will also offer gaming accessories such as OEM controllers and hard drives.
V3RGE has begun listing the products on Amazon.com with plans to expand their V3RGE eCommerce site as well.
The V3RGE retail stores will be located in Central Illinois, to be serviced by V3RGE 's East Peoria distribution center, and will also include games and software titles for the V3RGE systems.
Bruce Sewell Apple's General Counsel is NOT doing His Job and Apple PR Lead Steve Dowling is Covering for Bruce Sewell
Headlines Read
"Apple manager held on kickback charges"
- Hmmmm
My Guess is Paul Shin Devine is the fall guy for some BIGGER players..
I mean where is the Corrupt Bruce Sewell Fit into this One.. ?? and Come on a Million Dollars is NOTHING in the world of Apple, iPhone, and Computer Technology.. I Smell a RAT !!
These Billionaire Companies often pay around $50 Million Just to Call off Mergers.. I mean what in the world is the REAL issue over a Million Dollars.. when Apple is Making Billions on Top of Billions from Technology they have Stolen or in using Technoloty that their Apple General Counsel KNOWS is Stolen such as the Iviewit Stolen Patent.
From what I believe of Bruce Sewell, well he probably knew of Paul Shin Devine's activities and helped Paul Shin Devine pull it off.. I mean come on ... Apple PR Guy - Steve Dowling is So Absolutely full of Shit that Steve Dowling ~ Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."
So Apples Lead PR Guru, Genius Dipshit Steve Dowling Flat Out Lies Saying that Apple has Zero Tolerance for Dishonest Behavior Inside or Outside of the Company. What a Crock Steve Dowling, Apple is part of a Massive Shareholder Fraud Coverup in the Iviewit Technologies Inc. Stolen Technology and Apple General Counsel Corrupt Attorney Bruce Sewell has known of the Iviewit Scandal for a VERY Long Time. In Fact Bruce Sewell knew of the Iviewit Scandal before Bruce Sewell Left Intel Corp. as their General Counsel under "Mysterious" circumstances.
Wonder what Apple Lead PR Genius Steve Dowling has to Say about Apple Owing Billions to the Iviewit Technologies Company. OR What APPLE PR lead Steve Dowling has to Say about Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel and Bruce Sewell's Role in the Corrupt Intel Corp. Stealing and Using the Inviewit Technology Inventions ???
What Does PR Guy - Steve Dowling for Apple have to Say about the iPhone Technology that uses the Stolen Technology of the Iviewit Inventors and is VERY Known by Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ?
Steve Dowling Also .. and Seems to Be Serious as Steve Dowling Says it.. Well Steve Says, ""Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. " - OMG How can Steve Dowling Keep a Straight Face Saying this Crap.. ?? That is a Flat Out Lie, just Look at the History of APPLE big dicking the little guy, squashing on Inventor Rights and in some cases flat out Stealing Inventions.. or Licenses to Use them..
In Todays News, that .. Well To Me is Steaming with Back Stories and Scandals Galore.. Anyway Steve Dowling Here is Todays Apple Corruption News..
"Apple manager held on kickback charges - Apple manager arrested for alleged $1M in kickbacks"
An Apple manager was arrested Friday for allegedly accepting kickbacks from Asian suppliers, totaling more than $1 million.
Paul Shin Devine worked at Apple as a global supply manager and allegedly used his position to obtain confidential information from the company, according to the San Jose Mercury News. The information was then allegedly sold to the suppliers, helping them negotiate more favorable contracts with Apple.
"Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."
The companies involved in the kickback scheme were not named in the federal indictment, but it is known that they were suppliers of iPhone and iPod accessories.
Devine allegedly opened foreign bank accounts in his wife's name to disguise payments. It's not known at this time what tipped off the FBI and IRS to the kickback scheme or how deeply Apple was involved in the investigation.
In a separate action, Apple filed a civil suit against Devine for the kickbacks he allegedly received over several years.
Devine will appear in a San Jose court on Monday. "
Source of Post on Bruce Sewell, Paul Shin Devine, Steve Dowling
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20013665-37.html
So Paul Shin Devine - Got any Secrets On Apple or on Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ? If so I am All Blogger Ears and Ready to EXPOSE Bruce Sewell for the Corrupt, Evil, Technology Stealing, Criminal Assisting Gentleman that Bruce Sewell Really Is.. So Paul Shin Devine email me Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Attention anyone Knowing Paul Shin Devine - My Guess is that Paul Shin Devine is being set up for something bigger and that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel Knows About it..
So If you know Paul Shin Devine - eMail me a Tip on this Story,
I know there is MORE to It... Crystal@CrystalCox.com
"Apple manager held on kickback charges"
- Hmmmm
My Guess is Paul Shin Devine is the fall guy for some BIGGER players..
I mean where is the Corrupt Bruce Sewell Fit into this One.. ?? and Come on a Million Dollars is NOTHING in the world of Apple, iPhone, and Computer Technology.. I Smell a RAT !!
These Billionaire Companies often pay around $50 Million Just to Call off Mergers.. I mean what in the world is the REAL issue over a Million Dollars.. when Apple is Making Billions on Top of Billions from Technology they have Stolen or in using Technoloty that their Apple General Counsel KNOWS is Stolen such as the Iviewit Stolen Patent.
From what I believe of Bruce Sewell, well he probably knew of Paul Shin Devine's activities and helped Paul Shin Devine pull it off.. I mean come on ... Apple PR Guy - Steve Dowling is So Absolutely full of Shit that Steve Dowling ~ Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."
So Apples Lead PR Guru, Genius Dipshit Steve Dowling Flat Out Lies Saying that Apple has Zero Tolerance for Dishonest Behavior Inside or Outside of the Company. What a Crock Steve Dowling, Apple is part of a Massive Shareholder Fraud Coverup in the Iviewit Technologies Inc. Stolen Technology and Apple General Counsel Corrupt Attorney Bruce Sewell has known of the Iviewit Scandal for a VERY Long Time. In Fact Bruce Sewell knew of the Iviewit Scandal before Bruce Sewell Left Intel Corp. as their General Counsel under "Mysterious" circumstances.
Wonder what Apple Lead PR Genius Steve Dowling has to Say about Apple Owing Billions to the Iviewit Technologies Company. OR What APPLE PR lead Steve Dowling has to Say about Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel and Bruce Sewell's Role in the Corrupt Intel Corp. Stealing and Using the Inviewit Technology Inventions ???
What Does PR Guy - Steve Dowling for Apple have to Say about the iPhone Technology that uses the Stolen Technology of the Iviewit Inventors and is VERY Known by Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ?
Steve Dowling Also .. and Seems to Be Serious as Steve Dowling Says it.. Well Steve Says, ""Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. " - OMG How can Steve Dowling Keep a Straight Face Saying this Crap.. ?? That is a Flat Out Lie, just Look at the History of APPLE big dicking the little guy, squashing on Inventor Rights and in some cases flat out Stealing Inventions.. or Licenses to Use them..
In Todays News, that .. Well To Me is Steaming with Back Stories and Scandals Galore.. Anyway Steve Dowling Here is Todays Apple Corruption News..
"Apple manager held on kickback charges - Apple manager arrested for alleged $1M in kickbacks"
An Apple manager was arrested Friday for allegedly accepting kickbacks from Asian suppliers, totaling more than $1 million.
Paul Shin Devine worked at Apple as a global supply manager and allegedly used his position to obtain confidential information from the company, according to the San Jose Mercury News. The information was then allegedly sold to the suppliers, helping them negotiate more favorable contracts with Apple.
"Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."
The companies involved in the kickback scheme were not named in the federal indictment, but it is known that they were suppliers of iPhone and iPod accessories.
Devine allegedly opened foreign bank accounts in his wife's name to disguise payments. It's not known at this time what tipped off the FBI and IRS to the kickback scheme or how deeply Apple was involved in the investigation.
In a separate action, Apple filed a civil suit against Devine for the kickbacks he allegedly received over several years.
Devine will appear in a San Jose court on Monday. "
Source of Post on Bruce Sewell, Paul Shin Devine, Steve Dowling
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20013665-37.html
So Paul Shin Devine - Got any Secrets On Apple or on Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ? If so I am All Blogger Ears and Ready to EXPOSE Bruce Sewell for the Corrupt, Evil, Technology Stealing, Criminal Assisting Gentleman that Bruce Sewell Really Is.. So Paul Shin Devine email me Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Attention anyone Knowing Paul Shin Devine - My Guess is that Paul Shin Devine is being set up for something bigger and that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel Knows About it..
So If you know Paul Shin Devine - eMail me a Tip on this Story,
I know there is MORE to It... Crystal@CrystalCox.com
V3RGE - Information on V3RGE - Reviews on V3RGE.
V3RGE
V3RGE is an Online Company. V3RGE Sells Refurbished V3RGE Consoles, V3RGE Games and V3RGE Electronics. V3RGE is undergoing major, Positive Changes. V3RGE is undergoing expansion and positive action. V3RGE is striving for integrity and to build a quality online business.
V3RGE, more information on V3RGE Coming Soon.
V3RGE Complaints
V3RGE is an Online Company. V3RGE Sells Refurbished V3RGE Consoles, V3RGE Games and V3RGE Electronics. V3RGE is undergoing major, Positive Changes. V3RGE is undergoing expansion and positive action. V3RGE is striving for integrity and to build a quality online business.
V3RGE, more information on V3RGE Coming Soon.
V3RGE Complaints
Neuberger Berman very Interested in my Posts on Richard Chimberg and Neuberger Berman
Neuberger Berman PR Services - are You Interested?
Hmmm.. Neuberger Berman Sure interested in Posts on Richard Chimberg Today.
Remember back when Richard Chimberg PR Guy for Neuberger Berman emailed Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox (Me) and demanded I change a post on the Neuberger Berman Sale? Well since then Richard Chimberg has said no more to me and neither has in house PR Guy Randy Whitestone of Neuberger Berman.
I wonder How much Neuberger Berman pays Randy Whitestone and Richard Chimberg to do PR for them? I mean How Good Can Richard Chimberg and Randy Whitestone be if they do not even own their own dotcom, guess Randy Whitestone and Richard Chimberg were just riding the wave of the way things have always been and assume that their Cushy PR Jobs are safe..
I mean who could do better then Randy Whitestone and Richard Chimberg Right? Surely Richard Chimberg and Randall Whitestone have a handle on the Rumors Circulating about the now Infamous and Possibly Fraudulant Sale of Neuberger Berman.
So why is Neuberger Berman scouring my Industry Whistleblower Blogs Today? What is Neuberger Berman Looking for? Maybe Neuberger Berman wants to see if I Intent to write more on the Neuberger Berman Sale and the Possible Pending Lawsuits over the Neuberger Berman. I mean who knows why Neuberger Berman is on My Investigative Blogger Blogs today.
Somone from Manila, Philippines Today Searched "Neuberger Berman LLC "$30 million lawsuit" - So what's up with That.. There are so many Smoke and Mirrors with the Neuberger Berman Sale - the Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and well Let's Just Say if it Walks Like a A Duck... Well it's a Duck"...
The Depository Trust Company Brooklyn, New York Looking for "neuberger berman board of directors email address" - and Well they find my Sites on Neuberger Berman So What does Richard Chimberg and Randy Whitestone actually get Paid to do? Must be Neuberger Berman Press Releases, Smoke and Mirror Illusions to Pull S0mething over Somebody.. You would Think that a Hedge Fund.. or Really any Company worth over a Hundred Billion Dollars would Hire someone Better the Current Neuberger Berman PR Chumps..
Oh and someone at the California State University Searched "Neuberger Berman Scam" - So what is the Truth about Neuberger Berman and Just How many Billions was innocent Investors Scammed Out of in the Neuberger Berman Scam Sale of Smoke and Mirrors Illusions?
Got an Tips on Neuberger Berman,
Randy Whitestone, Lehman Brothers, Proskauer Rose
or Richard Chimberg?
If So email Email me, Crystal L. Cox -
Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Hmmm.. Neuberger Berman Sure interested in Posts on Richard Chimberg Today.
Remember back when Richard Chimberg PR Guy for Neuberger Berman emailed Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox (Me) and demanded I change a post on the Neuberger Berman Sale? Well since then Richard Chimberg has said no more to me and neither has in house PR Guy Randy Whitestone of Neuberger Berman.
I wonder How much Neuberger Berman pays Randy Whitestone and Richard Chimberg to do PR for them? I mean How Good Can Richard Chimberg and Randy Whitestone be if they do not even own their own dotcom, guess Randy Whitestone and Richard Chimberg were just riding the wave of the way things have always been and assume that their Cushy PR Jobs are safe..
I mean who could do better then Randy Whitestone and Richard Chimberg Right? Surely Richard Chimberg and Randall Whitestone have a handle on the Rumors Circulating about the now Infamous and Possibly Fraudulant Sale of Neuberger Berman.
So why is Neuberger Berman scouring my Industry Whistleblower Blogs Today? What is Neuberger Berman Looking for? Maybe Neuberger Berman wants to see if I Intent to write more on the Neuberger Berman Sale and the Possible Pending Lawsuits over the Neuberger Berman. I mean who knows why Neuberger Berman is on My Investigative Blogger Blogs today.
Somone from Manila, Philippines Today Searched "Neuberger Berman LLC "$30 million lawsuit" - So what's up with That.. There are so many Smoke and Mirrors with the Neuberger Berman Sale - the Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and well Let's Just Say if it Walks Like a A Duck... Well it's a Duck"...
The Depository Trust Company Brooklyn, New York Looking for "neuberger berman board of directors email address" - and Well they find my Sites on Neuberger Berman So What does Richard Chimberg and Randy Whitestone actually get Paid to do? Must be Neuberger Berman Press Releases, Smoke and Mirror Illusions to Pull S0mething over Somebody.. You would Think that a Hedge Fund.. or Really any Company worth over a Hundred Billion Dollars would Hire someone Better the Current Neuberger Berman PR Chumps..
Oh and someone at the California State University Searched "Neuberger Berman Scam" - So what is the Truth about Neuberger Berman and Just How many Billions was innocent Investors Scammed Out of in the Neuberger Berman Scam Sale of Smoke and Mirrors Illusions?
Got an Tips on Neuberger Berman,
Randy Whitestone, Lehman Brothers, Proskauer Rose
or Richard Chimberg?
If So email Email me, Crystal L. Cox -
Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)